Book a call

Log in

Book a call

Harry +44 7488 893313

All guides

Buyer's guides · Sector fit

Is commercial solar worth it for a manufacturer, warehouse or cold store?

Is solar worth it for your type of site? It depends on when you use power, not what you make.

Written by Harry HainesCEO & Co-Founder, CH Group Updated · 8 min read

CH Group runs controlled solar tenders for commercial sites of 100 kWp and above.

A factory roof with rows of solar panels, a warehouse and a cold store beside it, shown in daylight.

The short answer

Commercial solar is worth it when the site uses most of the power it generates in daylight. SurgePV, a design-software vendor, puts self-consumption at 80 to 90% for 24/7 manufacturing, 60 to 70% for two shifts and 50 to 60% for a day shift only, without a battery 1.

The sector matters less than the load profile. CH Group's four published case studies are all manufacturing or adjacent sites, with projected paybacks from 2.8 years to 6 years.

CH Group has no published warehouse or cold-store case study, so for those sites this guide gives public sources only.

Figures checked

Key numbers

Key numbers
FigureSource
Self-consumption, 24/7 manufacturing80 to 90%SurgePV, updated Mar 2026 (vendor)
Self-consumption, two shifts / day shift only60 to 70% / 50 to 60%SurgePV, updated Mar 2026 (vendor)
Warehouse self-consumption without / with battery50 to 60% / 75 to 90%EvoEnergy, updated Oct 2026 (installer)
Roof needed per kWp, warehouse8 to 10 m2EvoEnergy (installer)
Warehouse electricity cost cut, UKWA estimate40 to 80%DESNZ Solar Roadmap, 30 Jun 2025
CH Group manufacturing projects, projected payback2.8 years (PES) to 4 yrs 7 mths (Penton UK)CH Group case studies

What goes wrong, and what does it cost?

The common mistake is judging solar by sector or roof size instead of by when the site uses power, which leads to systems that are too large and savings that are overstated.

The board is asked to approve a system because "factories always benefit" or because the roof is huge. Neither is a reason.

  • Sizing to the roof, not the load. Power used on site avoids the import price. Power exported earns far less. A system that fills the roof but exports much of its output pays back more slowly than the headline suggests.
  • Believing a self-consumption claim nobody tested. One AI engine quoted "95%+" for cold storage. We found no primary source for it. The vendor page we could open says 60 to 80% 2.
  • Quoting a survey headline as a quote. A Cushman & Wakefield survey of 60+ stakeholders reports payback "as short as 5.5 years" and IRR "up to 18%" 3. Those are best-case survey figures, not a price for your roof.
  • Ignoring the roof and the lease. DESNZ notes that most commercial leases put repair duties on tenants and complicate installs 4. A tired roof may need work before panels go on. See is my site suitable for commercial solar.

Each mistake costs the same thing: a payback figure the site never reaches. The fix is twelve months of half-hourly data, which shows when the site actually uses power.

Which types of site get the most from rooftop solar?

Sites with high, steady daytime demand, such as 24/7 manufacturers, get the most from rooftop solar, while sites with small or evening-heavy loads relative to their roof get the least.

The table groups site types by daytime demand. The percentages are vendor and installer ranges, not measurements of your site. Your half-hourly data replaces them.

Site types by daytime demand profile
Site typeDaytime demandSelf-consumption (vendor range)Best for / watch out
Manufacturer, 24/7High and flat80 to 90% 1Best for: the highest share of power used on site. Watch out: roof age and structure.
Manufacturer, two shiftsHigh in daylight60 to 70% 1Best for: sizing the system to demand. Watch out: evening load the panels cannot meet.
Manufacturer, day shift onlyWeekdays, daylight50 to 60% 1Best for: weekday use. Watch out: weekend output exported at a low rate.
Ambient warehouseLighting, docks, forklift charging50 to 60%, 75 to 90% with a battery 5Best for: a large roof. Watch out: tenant demand can be small against the roof 6.
Cold storeRefrigeration around the clock60 to 80% 2Best for: a flat daytime base load. Watch out: roof structure, insulated panels and fire setbacks.

The ranges come from SurgePV, a design-software vendor, and EvoEnergy, an installer. Both have a commercial interest. Treat them as a screen, then test the site and compare bids on one basis (see how to compare commercial solar quotes). For the maths behind payback, see solar payback and ROI.

What does the evidence say about warehouses and cold storage?

Public sources say warehouse and cold-store roofs have large potential, but CH Group has no published case study in either sector, so the figures below are third-party and unverified against a real tender.

The UK Warehousing Association, using Delta-EE analysis from 2022, estimates that solar could cut warehouse electricity costs by 40 to 80%. DESNZ repeated this and a 15 GW rooftop potential across the UK's largest 20% of warehouses in its Solar Roadmap on 30 June 2025 4. The data is from 2022 and the original report was not available to us.

Cold stores run refrigeration around the clock, which gives a flat, high base load. SurgePV says compressors take about 55 to 65% of a cold store's electricity and demand tends to peak on hot summer afternoons, when solar output is also high 2.

The same source warns that cold-store roofs may need a structural review and fire setbacks, and that a roof with under about 15 years of remaining life may justify re-roofing first. It is a vendor claim, so ask your installer to confirm it for your roof.

Warehouses have a different problem. A 2024 guest article on the Solar Energy UK site, by InRange, says a tenant's demand can be as low as 5% of a roof's potential 6. A large roof does not make a large saving if the building uses little power.

How many kWp fits on a factory or warehouse roof, and what does it cost?

EvoEnergy, an installer, plans on 8 to 10 m2 of usable roof per kWp, so a 10,000 sq ft roof (929 m2) takes roughly 93 to 116 kWp, and EvoEnergy's indicative warehouse costs run from £450 to £900 per kWp depending on size.

The 8 to 10 m2 figure is EvoEnergy's planning rule for warehouse roofs 5. SurgePV gives lower figures for flat roofs, 5.5 to 6.5 m2 per kWp on usable area, and notes that 20 to 35% of gross roof area is lost to setbacks and obstacles 7. The survey decides which applies.

EvoEnergy's 2025 indicative fully installed prices for warehouse systems are:

  • 100 kWp: £600 to £900 per kWp
  • 250 kWp: £560 to £800 per kWp
  • 500 kWp: £500 to £760 per kWp
  • 1 MWp: £450 to £650 per kWp

These are one installer's ranges. For the full cost picture, see how much commercial solar costs in the UK. Ask whether each price includes VAT. Commercial solar is normally standard-rated at 20%; check the treatment with your accountant.

What have CH Group's manufacturing projects projected?

CH Group's four published case studies (two manufacturers, a diesel engine repair business and a plant hire business) project annual savings of £3,038 to £44,746 and paybacks of 2.8 years to 6 years.

All figures are projected, not achieved. Savings depend on each site's energy use, tariff and system. Merlin Diesel Systems (engine repair) and Kelston Sparks (plant hire) are industrial sites rather than strict manufacturers.

CH Group projects, all figures projected
SiteSystemProjected annual savingsProjected paybackInstall time
Plastic Engineering Solutions (plastic manufacturing)150 kWp£25,182 (23% bill reduction)2.8 years2 weeks
Penton UK (electronics manufacturer)16.32 kWp£3,0384 yrs 7 mths2 days
Merlin Diesel Systems (diesel engine repair)278.5 kWp£44,7466 years8 weeks, with 41,000 sq ft over-cladding
Kelston Sparks (plant and machinery hire)116 kWp£20,0752 yrs 10 mths1 week

The spread in payback is the point. Same technology, different sites. Merlin's project also combined the solar with a major roof upgrade, 41,000 sq ft of full roof over-cladding. See all four projects.

Who should not expect much from rooftop solar?

Sites that use little power in daylight, tenants without landlord consent, and buildings with roofs near the end of their life should not expect a strong return from rooftop solar.

  • Mostly evening or night load. Panels generate in daylight. A site that runs mainly at night exports most of the output, and export pays far less than avoided import.
  • Tenants without consent. A lease usually needs landlord agreement, and DESNZ says leases complicate installs 4.
  • Weak credit and no capital. DESNZ says behind-the-meter finance is hard for businesses without strong credit 4. See funding options.
  • Buyers who already hold comparable quotes. Solar may still pay, but a managed tender adds little for a small, simple system with a trusted installer.

Illustrative example

100 kWh generated on a day-shift site and on a 24/7 site

This example uses the SurgePV self-consumption ranges and the DESNZ provisional average manufacturing electricity price for Q2 2026 of 17.4p per kWh, excluding the Climate Change Levy 8. It ignores export income and is not a forecast for any site.

  1. Day-shift site: midpoint of 50 to 60% is 55%. 55 kWh used on site at 17.4p avoids £9.57.
  2. 24/7 site: midpoint of 80 to 90% is 85%. 85 kWh used on site at 17.4p avoids £14.79.
  3. Difference: £5.22 per 100 kWh generated, about 55% more avoided cost from the same panels.

The panels are identical. The load profile moves the result. That is why self-consumption comes from your half-hourly data, not from the sector.

Your next steps

  1. Get twelve months of half-hourly data Ask your supplier or meter operator for it before you speak to any installer.

  2. Mark when the site uses power Note shift patterns, weekend loads, and any refrigeration or process load that runs through the night.

  3. Check the roof and the lease Confirm roof age, structure, asbestos and landlord consent before spending on design.

  4. Compare like for like Ask every bidder for the same inputs so self-consumption and payback can be compared. Our guide on how to compare commercial solar quotes explains the method.

How CH Group handles this

Many finance directors are given a self-consumption number they cannot check. We start from your meter instead.

CH Group verifies twelve months of half-hourly data, so claims such as "95% self-consumption" are tested against your site. We run one controlled tender to our panel of vetted installer partners, and every proposal is compared on the same ten variables, including self-consumption and payback. Our fee is agreed in writing before you commit to anything, and installer partners also pay CH Group. Every partner bids against the same brief, so no installer can buy a better place in the comparison.

Our published case studies are manufacturing and related industrial sites, with projected results only.

Questions buyers ask next

Is solar worth it for a manufacturer running one shift?

It can be, but self-consumption is lower. SurgePV, a vendor, puts day-shift sites at 50 to 60%. Weekend output is exported, so system size should follow weekday demand rather than the roof.

Does solar work for cold storage that runs 24/7?

Round-the-clock refrigeration gives a steady base load, and SurgePV, a design-software vendor, puts it at 60 to 80%. We found no primary source for claims of 95% or more. Roof structure and fire setbacks need checking first.

How many solar panels does a warehouse need?

That depends on the load, not the roof. As a roof guide, EvoEnergy, an installer, plans on 8 to 10 m2 per kWp, so a 10,000 sq ft roof fits roughly 93 to 116 kWp. Size the system to daytime demand within that limit.

Should I add a battery?

EvoEnergy says a battery can lift warehouse self-consumption from 50 to 60% to 75 to 90%. Whether it pays depends on your load and the extra cost, so ask each bidder to price the system with and without storage.

What happens after I sign?

The installer completes design, the grid connection application and installation. CH Group's four published projects were installed in 2 days to 8 weeks, depending on size and roof works. Ask for the performance and maintenance terms in writing before you sign.

Sources

Public figures are from the sources below, as published on the dates shown. CH Group project figures are projections supplied for each case study. This guide is general information, not financial, tax or legal advice.

  1. SurgePV, Industrial Solar: Solar Panels for Factories and Manufacturing Sites, Updated 13 Mar 2026.
  2. SurgePV, Solar Design for Cold Storage: 24/7 Refrigeration, Updated 4 Nov 2026.
  3. Cushman & Wakefield, Unlocking Solar PV Potential in UK Logistics Properties, Undated.
  4. DESNZ, Solar roadmap: United Kingdom powered by solar, 30 Jun 2025.
  5. EvoEnergy, Commercial Solar Panels for Warehouses & Logistics: A Complete Guide, Updated 13 Oct 2026.
  6. Solar Energy UK, Warehouse solar article (guest author, InRange), 7 Nov 2024.
  7. SurgePV, Commercial Solar System Design, Updated 13 Mar 2026.
  8. DESNZ, Quarterly Energy Prices September 2026, 29 Sep 2026.

Let's look at your site.

A short call with Harry or James. We get to know your site, energy use and objectives, and show you how a structured tender would work for you.

  1. Initial review We get to know your site, energy use and objectives.

  2. Energy assessment We analyse your energy data and solar potential.

  3. Structured tender Our vetted EPC partners compete for your project, and we give you a clear recommendation.

Book a call

Opens Calendly in a new tab.

Prefer to talk now? Call Harry on +44 7488 893313.